Skip main navigation

Military Health System

Clear Your Browser Cache

This website has recently undergone changes. Users finding unexpected concerns may care to clear their browser's cache to ensure a seamless experience.

U.S. Army Mortality Surveillance in Active Duty Soldiers, 2014–2019

Image of 17999261. Preventable deaths are a significant issue in the Army population, and a better understanding of these deaths can focus attention on behavioral and medical factors that affect military readiness.

Mortality surveillance is an important activity for capturing information on a population’s health. This retrospective surveillance analysis utilizes administrative data sources to describe active duty U.S. Army soldiers who died from 2014 to 2019, and calculate mortality rates, assess trends by category of death, and identify leading causes of death within subpopulations. During the surveillance period, 2,530 soldier deaths were reported. The highest crude mortality rates observed during the 6-year surveillance period were for deaths by suicide, followed by accidental (i.e., unintentional injury) deaths. The crude mortality rates for natural deaths decreased significantly over the 6-year period, by an average of 6% annually. The leading causes of death were suicide by gunshot wound, motor vehicle accidents, suicide by hanging, neoplasms, and cardiovascular events. Significant differences were observed in the leading causes of death in relation to demographic characteristics, which has important implications for the development of focused educational campaigns to improve health behaviors and safe driving habits. Current public health programs to prevent suicide should be evaluated, with new approaches for firearm safety considered.

What are the new findings?

The mortality rate for natural causes declined 6% annually, from 18.8 deaths per 100,000 soldiers in 2014 to 13.4 deaths per 100,000 in 2019, which was statistically significant. During this period, when annual mortality rates for natural deaths declined significantly, the highest Army mortality rates were for deaths due to suicide, followed by accidental death. Despite the decline in natural deaths, neoplasms remain the leading cause of death in women and older soldiers.

What is the impact on readiness and force health protection?

This report provides more accurate mortality surveillance for the Army population and is the only all-cause mortality report published by the Defense Health Agency since 2016. Preventable deaths are a significant issue in the Army population. A better understanding of these deaths can focus attention on both behavioral and medical factors that affect military readiness. This report reveals trends in mortality and related subject areas that require more active or renewed prevention efforts.

Background

Mortality surveillance is an important activity for capturing information on a population’s health, as it tracks new and emerging health trends in a population and informs future prevention efforts.1 Mortality surveillance in the U.S. Army is essential for identifying and understanding the occupational exposures that increase risk of premature soldier death.2 Given that approximately 70% of soldiers are young adults under 35 years of age, this translates to significant potential years of life lost.

Few public health investigations have focused on all-cause mortality in the U.S. Armed Forces.2-4 Prior investigations within the military were restricted to specific categories and causes of death, such as neoplasms, infectious diseases, and suicide.5-8 The few investigations that examined all-cause mortality concluded that male, non-Hispanic White, and 17-34-year-old service members had the highest mortality rates in the U.S. military. 

No known prior studies have examined the differences in the leading causes of death among subpopulations, such as sex, age, and racial ethnicity, in the U.S. Army. Strata-specific analysis by demographic characteristics is an important epidemiological methodology that recognizes consequential social, environmental, and biological differences among subgroups.9 The objectives of this study were to describe the demographic characteristics of U.S. Army active duty soldiers who died from 2014 to 2019, identify leading causes of death within subpopulations, and calculate mortality rates to assess trends by category of death.

Methods

Study Design and Population

This retrospective surveillance analysis included information on mortality among U.S. Army active duty (Army active component, activated National Guard or Reserve) soldiers from 2014 to 2019. Soldiers who were between 17 and 64 years of age at the time of their death were included in this study. This project was reviewed and approved by the Office of Human Protections Public Health Review Board, Defense Centers for Public Health–Aberdeen. 

Data Sources and Study Variables

The Defense Casualty Information Processing System, which collects information on service members who die while in service, was the primary source of category of death, as its data are more complete. If information on category of death was not available in DCIPS, it was obtained from the Department of Defense Medical Mortality Registry maintained by the Mortality Surveillance Division of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner System. Category of death, determined by a civilian or AFMES coroner or medical examiner, was categorized as either accidental (i.e., unintentional injury), natural, suicide, homicide, combat (separate from homicide), undetermined, or pending (separate from undetermined). Combat and pending deaths are not consistent with National Association of Medical Examiner standards and guidelines of 5 “manners of death,” so the term “category of death” is used instead, as “manner of death” has a specific definition.10 Combat deaths occur in theater because of hostile actions. Deaths still under investigation are classified as pending but are typically reclassified within 12 months. Data from DCIPS and AFMES were obtained in November 2021.

For underlying causes of death, the Suicide Data Repository, created and maintained by the DOD and Veterans Affairs, served as the primary source of information, as this information is not available from the AFMES or DCIPS.11 These data were obtained in November 2020. Cause of death is defined as the event that initiated the sequence of events resulting in death, recoded from International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes obtained from the National Death Index.12,13 For example, if accident is a category of death, then possible causes of death could be drowning, poisoning, or falls. Causes are not presented for combat-related deaths, because this category is based on only 2 ICD-10 codes: Y36 (Operations of war) and Y89.1 (Sequelae of war operations); these definitions were obtained from the World Health Organization ICD-10 manual.12

Demographic characteristics such as sex (female, male) and age (17-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-64 years) were obtained from the DCIPS. Race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian / Pacific Islander [A/PI], Hispanic, non-Hispanic American Indian / Alaskan Native, unknown) and Army population estimates were obtained from the Defense Manpower Data Center. To obtain the total U.S. Army active duty population, each component's troop counts for September of each year were derived from DMDC.

Analytical Approach

Univariate statistics (counts, percentages) were used to report the distribution of the categories of death, stratified by cause, age, sex, and race and ethnicity, from 2014 to 2019. The five leading underlying causes of death were reported overall as well as stratified by age, sex, and race and ethnicity based on counts. Leading underlying causes of death refers to the five most frequently occurring causes with the largest number of deaths reported over the 6-year period.

Crude annual mortality rates by category of death from 2014 to 2019 were calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the number of soldiers per year, multiplied by 100,000. Annual rates for the combat and homicide deaths were not included due to the high number of instances with less than 20 cases.14 Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals of trend analyses were calculated using Poisson regression. Mortality data are not subject to sampling error because it is expected that all deaths in the population are captured, so 95% CIs are not reported for crude rates.15 All data management and statistical analyses were conducted using SAS® (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Inc., 2013, Cary, NC).

Results

Category of Death

Between 2014 and 2019, 2,530 deaths occurred among U.S. Army soldiers (Table 1). During this period, suicide (n=883, 35%) was the most common category of death, followed by accidental death (n=814, 33%). Gunshot wounds (GSWs) accounted for 65% of suicide deaths, and about two-thirds of accidental deaths were transportation-related (67%). Natural death (n=534, 21%), the next most frequent category, was often caused by neoplasms or cancer (49%). GSWs were the cause of 79% of homicide deaths, and if legal interventions (i.e., legal execution or death by law enforcement) are included, that number increases to 82%.

Click on the table to access a 508-compliant PDF version

Cause of Death

Overall, the five leading causes of death from 2014 to 2019 were suicide by GSW (n=575), motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) (n=431), neoplasms (n=263), suicide by hanging or asphyxiation (n=228), and cardiovascular events (n=145). When stratified by age group, MVAs were the leading cause for soldiers aged 17-24 years (Table 2). Accidental overdose (AOD) and homicide by GSW were the fourth and fifth leading causes for soldiers under age 35. Neoplasms were the leading cause in the oldest age group and women. The leading cause of death in non-Hispanic Black soldiers was MVAs (n=100). AOD was the fifth leading cause of death for non-Hispanic White soldiers.

Click on the table to access a 508-compliant PDF version

Trends in Mortality Rates

From 2014 to 2019, suicide was generally the category with the highest cumulative mortality rate, followed by accidental death (Figure), with the exception of 2017.

This graph presents a series of three symbols, each of which represents a category of death: Accident, Natural, or Suicide. The x-, or horizontal, axis is divided into six intervals, each of which represents an individual year from 2014 through 2019. The y-, or vertical, axis represents the numbers of deaths of soldiers per 100,000 soldiers. Within each year interval on the x axis, three symbols are plotted to indicate the numbers of deaths in that year for each category of death. For every year except 2017, Suicide was the most prevalent category of death among Army active duty soldiers, ranging from 25 to approximately 32 deaths per 100,000 soldiers each year. With the exception of 2017, deaths due to Accident were the second leading cause, ranging from approximately 24 to 30 deaths per 100,000 soldiers each year. Natural death was consistently the least frequent cause of death, ranging from approximately 13 to 20 deaths per 100,000 soldiers each year. Deaths due to Suicide peaked in 2018 at 32 per 100,000 soldiers and declined to approximately 28 per 100,000 soldiers the following year. The graph also provides a trend line for each cause of death, which shows that Suicides gradually increased over the six year period, while Accidental deaths increased only slightly. Natural deaths declined in an inverse proportion to the trend increase in deaths due to Suicide.

The crude rate of accidental death showed a slight annual upward trend of 2% (RR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.06) as it increased from 24.7 deaths per 100,000 soldiers in 2014 to 26.3 deaths per 100,000 soldiers in 2019 (Table 3). The annual rate of suicide death also showed a slight upward trend of 3% (RR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07), as it increased from 25.4 deaths per 100,000 soldiers in 2014 to 28.8 deaths per 100,000 soldiers in 2019. Neither of these trends was statistically significant, however. The mortality rate for natural causes declined 6% (RR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98) annually, from 18.8 deaths per 100,000 soldiers in 2014 to 13.4 deaths per 100,000 soldiers in 2019, which was statistically significant.

Click on the table to access a 508-compliant PDF version

Discussion

This is the first report since 2016 to expand on the underlying leading causes of death stratified by each demographic characteristic in the U.S. Army. The highest mortality rates were for suicide, and suicide by GSW remained the leading cause of death. The Army implements various initiatives that evaluate, identify, and track high-risk individuals for suicidal behavior and other adverse outcomes.16,17 Current measures are used to track and educate soldiers on securing privately-owned weapons—as the literature has concluded that storing firearms locked, unloaded, or both are associated with a lower risk of suicide mortality—but findings on the effectiveness of these programs are limited.18,19 A more passive approach, such as strict gun control policies, should also be considered.19-21 For instance, in a report released in 2023 by the Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee recommendations included establishing and updating gun control and safety policies to include requiring all privately-owned weapons in DOD military property to be registered and properly stored, and implementing waiting periods and minimum age requirements for privately-owned weapons and ammunition purchases on DOD property.22

Accidental death was the next most frequent category of mortality. Although no significant trend was detected in this study, the rate has decreased substantially since 2011.23,24 MVAs were the second leading cause of death overall, and for the youngest age group as well as non-Hispanic Black soldiers. Prior studies have suggested this may be due to inexperience, high rates of alcohol use, and lower likelihood of wearing seatbelts increasing odds of death.25,26 The United States Army Combat Readiness Safety Center’s mass safety campaigns aim to reduce transportation-related crashes, but programs tailored to these high-risk groups may be necessary to affect change.27 AOD was the fifth leading cause of death for non-Hispanic White service members, as well as the fourth leading cause for soldiers under age 35, which aligns with findings from prior reports that demonstrated higher rates of substance abuse and dependence among these groups.28

During this same period, the mortality rate for natural deaths declined significantly. Similar decreasing trends in deaths from natural causes such as heart disease and cancer were observed within the U.S. population from 2018 to 2019.29,30 Neoplasms are still the leading cause of death for female and older soldiers, and among women this result may be related to low cancer screening rates, based on findings in the literature. Recent studies have concluded that female service members were not compliant with breast or cervical cancer screening guidelines despite universal access to health care and completion of the Periodic Health Assessment every 13 months.31-34 The PHA tracks cancer screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers, as well as risk factors for lung cancer (e.g., smoking and tobacco use). Cardiovascular diseases and events were also a leading natural cause of death. This may be related to several cardiovascular risk factors observed in soldiers such as high blood pressure, smoking, and high body mass index.35 To improve the health and well-being of its service members, the DOD has implemented initiatives such as the Performance Triad, which establishes guidelines for increasing physical activity, eating a well-balanced diet, and receiving adequate sleep, and which have shown to be protective against adverse health outcomes in service members.36-37

Due to the 2-year data lag in mortality data, the number of cases missing underlying causes of death was highest in 2019. As a result, reporting for that year may underestimate the true mortality burden. Active duty soldiers who separated from the Army were excluded, thereby underestimating a soldier’s risk of death, as previous studies have found higher mortality rates among separated soldiers compared to those who did not.38 Small sample sizes were an issue for some subgroups, particularly American Indian / Alaskan Natives, and findings for this group should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, population estimates for September of each year were used to calculate rates, which may have led to inaccurate estimates. Despite these limitations, these data are comprehensive and capture all deaths among active duty soldiers while in service during the surveillance period.

From 2014 to 2019, when annual mortality rates for natural deaths significantly declined, the highest Army mortality rates were for suicide, followed by accidental death. Evaluation of various public health suicide prevention programs and services, and a greater emphasis on firearm storage and safety, may be needed to reduce suicide. Public health campaigns promoting safe driving habits and healthy behaviors can be refined by examining a combination of the underlying causes of death and contributing factors that provide contextual information for developing effective targeted prevention efforts. Despite the decline in natural deaths, neoplasms remain the leading cause of death in women and older soldiers, underscoring the importance of promoting healthy behaviors and staying up-to-date with cancer screenings.

Author Affiliations

General Dynamics Information Technology Inc., Falls Church, VA: Ms. Kaplansky; Division of Behavioral and Social Health Outcomes Practice, Defense Centers for Public Health–Aberdeen, Defense Health Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD: Ms. Kaplansky, Dr. Toussaint.

Acknowledgments

This work is the result of collaborative efforts of the Defense Health Agency Army Satellite and Defense Health Agency, Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen Division of Behavioral and Social Health Outcomes Practice. We would specifically like to acknowledge Ms. Jessica Sharkey for expert editorial and technical review. 

Human Participant Protection

The Defense Centers for Public Health–Aberdeen Office of Human Protections Director determined this activity to be public health practice under OHP 19-802 (16-500).

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Department of Defense, Defense Health Agency, nor the U.S. Government.

References

  1. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics System: Modernizing the National Vital Statistics System. Updated Jan. 28, 2023. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/modernization.htm
  2. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center. Deaths while on active duty in the U.S. Armed Forces, 1990–2011. MSMR. 2012;19(5):2-5.
  3. Reger MA, Smolenski DJ, Skopp NA, et al. Suicides, homicides, accidents, and undetermined deaths in the U.S. military: comparisons to the U.S. population and by military separation status. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(3):139-146.e1. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.12.008
  4. Mancha BE, Watkins EY, Nichols JN, Seguin PG, Bell AM. Mortality surveillance in the U.S. Army, 2005-2011. Mil Med. 2014;179(12):1478-1486. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00539
  5. Webber BJ, Tacke CD, Wolff GG, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality among fighter aviators in the United States Air Force. J Occup Environ Med. 2022;64(1):71-78. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000002353
  6. Potter RN, Tremaine LA, Gaydos JC. Mortality surveillance for infectious diseases in the U.S. Department of Defense (1998-2013). Mil Med. 2017;182(3):e1713-e1718. doi:10.7205/MILMEDD-16-00304
  7. Pruitt LD, Smolenski DJ, Bush NE, et al. Suicide in the military: understanding rates and risk factors across the United States Armed Forces. Mil Med. 2019;184(suppl 1):432-437. doi:10.1093/milmed/usy296 
  8. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center. Deaths by suicide while on active duty, active and reserve components, U.S. Armed Forces, 1998-2011. MSMR. 2012;19(6):7-10.
  9. Ward JB, Gartner DR, Keyes KM, et al. How do we assess a racial disparity in health? Distribution, interaction, and interpretation in epidemiological studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2019;29:1-7. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.09.007   
  10. Hanzlick R, JC Hunsaker, Davis GJ, National Association of Medical Examiners. A Guide for Manner of Death Classification, First Edition. National Association of Medical Examiners; 2002. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://name.memberclicks.net/assets/docs/mannerofdeath.pdf
  11. Defense Suicide Prevention Office, U.S. Department of Defense. The Suicide Data Repository (SDR) Fact Sheet. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://www.dspo.mil/Portals/113/Documents/SDR%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf   
  12. World Health Organization. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. 5th Edition. World Health Organization; 2016. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2019/en 
  13. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Instruction Manual, Part 9: ICD-10 Cause-of-Death Lists for Tabulating Mortality Statistics (Updated March 2009 to include WHO updates to ICD-10 for data year 2009). National Center for Health Statistics; 2009. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/Part9InstructionManual2009.pdf 
  14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury Prevention and Control: WISQARSTM Fatal Injury Mapping: Section 3.4, Annotation and Suppression of Unstable Rates. Updated Jun. 21, 2018. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/mapping_help/unstable_rates.html 
  15. Chiang CL. Standard error of the age-adjusted death rate. Vital Statistics Special Report. 1961;47(9):257-285. 
  16. Stanley JL, Toussaint MN, Kaplansky GF, Pfau EJ, U.S. Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen. Surveillance of Suicidal Behavior: U.S. Army Active and Reserve Component Soldiers, 2019 and 2020. U. S. Defense Centers for Public Health-Aberdeen, 2022. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1211021.pdf   
  17. Hoyt T, Repke DM. Development and implementation of U.S. Army guidelines for managing soldiers at risk of suicide. Mil Med. 2019;184(suppl 1):426-431. doi:10.1093/milmed/usy284   
  18. Department of the Army, U.S. Department of Defense. ALARACT 063/2013, Control and Reporting of Privately Owned Weapons. 2013. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://safety.army.mil/Portals/0/Documents/off-duty/privatelyownedweapons/Standard/ALARACT_063_2013.pdf 
  19. Shenassa ED, Rogers ML, Spalding KL, Roberts MB. Safer storage of firearms at home and risk of suicide: a study of protective factors in a nationally representative sample. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58(10):841-848. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.017343 
  20. Paul ME, Coakley BA. State gun regulations and reduced gun ownership are associated with fewer firearm-related suicides among both juveniles and adults in the USA. J Pediatr Surg. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.01.005   
  21. Rich JA, Miech EJ, Semenza DC, Corbin TJ. How combinations of state firearm laws link to low firearm suicide and homicide rates: a configurational analysis. Prev Med. 2022;165:107262. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107262   
  22. Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee, U.S. Department of Defense. Preventing Suicide in the U.S. Military: Recommendations from the Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee. U.S. Department of Defense; 2023. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://media.defense.gov/2023/Feb/24/2003167430/-1/-1/0/SPRIRC-final-report.pdf   
  23. Mancha BE, Watkins EY, Nichols JN, Seguin PG, Bell AM. Mortality surveillance in the U.S. Army, 2005-2011. Mil Med. 2014;179(12):1478-1486. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00539   
  24. Mancha BE, Abdur-Rahman IT, Mitchell TA, et al, Army Public Health Center–Aberdeen. Mortality Surveillance in the U.S. Army, 2005-2014. Army Public Health Center–Aberdeen; 2016.   
  25. Bell NS, Amoroso PJ, Yore MM, Smith GS, Jones BH. Self-reported risk-taking behaviors and hospitalization for motor vehicle injury among active duty army personnel. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3 suppl):85-95. doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00168-3   
  26. Braver ER. Race, Hispanic origin, and socioeconomic status in relation to motor vehicle occupant death rates and risk factors among adults. Acc Anal Prev. 2003;35(3):295-309. 
  27. Department of the Army, U.S. Department of Defense. U.S. Army Combat Readiness Center. Accessed Feb. 23, 2022. https://safety.army.mil 
  28. Toussaint MN, Kc U, Werwath T, Watkins EY, U.S. Army Public Health Center. Surveillance of Substance Abuse and Dependence: U.S. Army Soldiers, January 2016–December 2019; Public Health Report S.0079048.3-16, Clinical Public Health and Epidemiology, Division of Behavioral and Social Health Outcomes Practice. U.S. Army Public Health Center; 2021. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1159860.pdf   
  29. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC WONDER: About Underlying Cause of Death, 1999-2020. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html   
  30. Kochanek KD, Xu JQ, Arias E, National Center for Health Statistics. Mortality in the United States, 2019. NCHS Data Brief 395. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db395-H.pdf 
  31. Seay J, Matsuno RK, Porter B, et al. Cervical cancer screening compliance among active duty service members in the US military. Prev Med Rep. 2022;26:101746. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101746   
  32. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, U.S. Department of Defense. Instruction 6025.19, Individual Medical Readiness (IMR). Updated Jul. 13, 2022. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/602519p.pdf   
  33. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, U.S. Department of Defense. Instruction 6200.06, Periodic Health Assessment (PHA) Program. Updated Sep. 8, 2016. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/620006p.pdf 
  34. Mani V, Banaag A, Munigala S, et al. Trends in breast cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic within a universally insured health system in the United States, 2017-2022. Cancer Med. 2023;12(18):19126-19136. doi:10.1002/cam4.6487   
  35. Shrestha A, Ho TE, Vie LL, et al. Comparison of cardiovascular health between US Army and civilians. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(12):e009056. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.009056   
  36. Department of the Army, U.S. Department of Defense. Performance Triad: The Total Army Family Guide: A Guide to Help with Enhancing Your Health with Sleep, Activity, and Nutrition. U.S. Department of Defense; 2016. Accessed Apr. 22, 2024. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D101-PURL-gpo65572/pdf/GOVPUB-D101-PURL-gpo65572.pdf
  37. Christopher P, Geary C, Gibson N, et al, Defense Centers for Public Health–Aberdeen. Examining the Relationship Between Soldiers' Sleep, Activity, and Nutrition Behaviors and Readiness Outcomes: Public Health Assessment Report S.0097429-23a. Health Promotion and Wellness Public Health Assessment Division, Defense Centers for Public Health–Aberdeen; 2023. Accessed Apr. 25, 2024. https://ph.health.mil/PHC%20Resource%20Library/hpw-san-readiness-outcomesreport.pdf 
  38. Ramchand, R. Suicide Among Veterans: Veterans’ Issues in Focus. RAND Corporation; 2021. doi:10.7249/pea1363-1

You also may be interested in...

Report
Sep 1, 2022

MSMR Vol. 29 No. 09 - September 2022

.PDF | 2.12 MB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Surveillance trends for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, Sept. 27, 2020 – Oct. 2,2021; Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance within the ...

Article
Aug 1, 2022

Musculoskeletal Injuries During U.S. Air Force Special Warfare Training Assessment and Selection, Fiscal Years 2019–2021.

U.S. Air Force Capt. Hopkins, 351st Special Warfare Training Squadron, Instructor Flight commander and Chief Combat Rescue Officer (CRO) instructor, conducts a military free fall equipment jump from a DHC-4 Caribou aircraft in Coolidge, Arizona, July 17, 2021. Hopkins is recognized as the 2020 USAF Special Warfare Instructor Company Grade Officer of the Year for his outstanding achievement from January 1 to December 31, 2020.

Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are costly and the leading cause of medical visits and disability in the U.S. military.1,2 Within training envi­ronments, MSK injuries may lead to a loss of training, deferment to a future class, or voluntary disenrollment from a training pipeline, all of which are impediments to maintaining full levels of manpower and ...

Article
Aug 1, 2022

Brief Report: Pain and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Screening Outcomes Among Military Personnel Injured During Combat Deployment.

U.S. Air Force Airman 1st Class Miranda Lugo, right, 18th Operational Medical Readiness Squadron mental health technician and Guardian Wingman trainer, and Maj. Joanna Ho, left, 18th OMRS director of psychological health, discuss the suicide prevention training program, Guardian Wingman, at Kadena Air Base, Japan, Aug. 20, 2021. Guardian Wingman aims to promote wingman culture and early help-seeking behavior. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Anna Nolte)

The post-9/11 U.S. military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan lasted over a decade and yielded the most combat casualties since the Vietnam War. While patient survivability increased to the high­est level in history, a changing epidemiology of combat injuries emerged whereby focus shifted to addressing an array of long-term sequelae, including ...

Report
Aug 1, 2022

MSMR Vol. 29 No. 08 - August 2022

.PDF | 822.83 KB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Surveillance trends for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, Sept. 27, 2020 – Oct. 2,2021; Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance within the ...

Article
Jul 1, 2022

Suicide Behavior Among Heterosexual, Lesbian/Gay, and Bisexual Active Component Service Members in the U.S. Armed Forces.

  The DOD’s theme for National Suicide Prevention Month is “Connect to Protect: Support is Within Reach.” Deployments, COVID-19 restrictions, and the upcoming winter season are all stressors and potential causes for depression that could lead to suicidal ideations. Options are available to individuals who are having thoughts of suicide and those around them (Photo by Kirk Frady, Regional Health Command Europe).

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals are at a particularly high risk for suicidal behavior in the general population of the United States. This study aims to determine if there are differences in the frequency of lifetime suicide ideation and suicide attempts between heterosexual, lesbian/gay, and bisexual service members in the active ...

Article
Jul 1, 2022

Surveillance Trends for SARS-CoV-2 and Other Respiratory Pathogens Among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, 27 September 2020–2 October 2021.

Staff Sgt. Misty Poitra and Senior Airman Chris Cornette, 119th Medical Group, collect throat swabs during voluntary COVID-19 rapid drive-thru testing for members of the community while North Dakota Army National Guard Soldiers gather test-subject data in the parking lot of the FargoDome in Fargo, N.D., May 3, 2020. The guardsmen partnered with the N.D. Department of Health and other civilian agencies in the mass-testing efforts of community volunteers. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Chief Master Sgt. David H. Lipp)

Respiratory pathogens, such as influenza and adenovirus, have been the main focus of the Department of Defense Global Respiratory Pathogen Surveillance Program (DoDGRPSP) since 1976.1. However, DoDGRPSP also began focusing on SARS-CoV-2 when COVID-19 was declared a pandemic illness in early March 2020.2. Following this declaration, the DOD quickly ...

Article
Jul 1, 2022

Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 Genomic Surveillance Within the Military Health System During 1 March–31 December 2020.

Dr. Peter Larson loads an Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencer in support of COVID-19 sequencing assay development at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland. (Photo by John Braun Jr., USAMRIID.)

This report describes SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance conducted by the Department of Defense (DOD) Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Branch and the Next-Generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Consortium (NGSBC) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Samples and sequence data were from SARS-CoV-2 infections occurring among Military Health System ...

Article
Jul 1, 2022

Brief Report: Phase I Results Using the Virtual Pooled Registry Cancer Linkage System (VPR-CLS) for Military Cancer Surveillance.

A patient at Naval Hospital Pensacola prepares to have a low-dose computed tomography test done to screen for lung cancer. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men and women. Early detection can lower the risk of dying from this disease. (U.S. Navy photo by Jason Bortz)

The Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, as part of its surveillance mission, periodically conducts studies of cancer incidence among U.S. military service members. However, service members are likely lost to follow-up from the Department of Defense cancer registry and Military Health System data sets after leaving service and during periods of ...

Report
Jul 1, 2022

MSMR Vol. 29 No. 07 - July 2022

.PDF | 1.67 MB

A monthly publication of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division. This issue of the peer-reviewed journal contains the following articles: Surveillance trends for SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens among U.S. Military Health System Beneficiaries, Sept. 27, 2020 – Oct. 2,2021; Establishment of SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance within the ...

Article
Jun 1, 2022

Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Deployed Active and Reserve Component Service Members, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

As in previous years, among service members deployed during 2021, injury/poisoning, musculoskeletal diseases and signs/symptoms accounted for more than half of the total health care burden during deployment. Compared to garrison disease burden, deployed service members had relatively higher proportions of encounters for respiratory infections, skin ...

Article
Jun 1, 2022

Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Non-service Member Beneficiaries of the Military Health System, 2021

In 2021, mental health disorders accounted for the largest proportions of the morbidity and health care burdens that affected the pediatric and younger adult beneficiary age groups. Among adults aged 45–64 and those aged 65 or older, musculoskeletal diseases accounted for the most morbidity and health care burdens. As in previous years, this report ...

Article
Jun 1, 2022

Hospitalizations, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

The hospitalization rate in 2021 was 48.0 per 1,000 person-years (p-yrs), the second lowest rate of the most recent 10 years. For hospitalizations limited to military facilities, the rate in 2021 was the lowest for the entire period. As in prior years, the majority (71.2%) of hospitalizations were associated with diagnoses in the categories of mental ...

Article
Jun 1, 2022

Absolute and Relative Morbidity Burdens Attributable to Various Illnesses and Injuries, Active Component, U.S. Armed Forces, 2021

In 2021, as in prior years, the medical conditions associated with the most medical encounters, the largest number of affected service members, and the greatest number of hospital days were in the major categories of injuries, musculoskeletal disorders, and mental health disorders. Despite the pandemic, COVID-19 accounted for less than 2% of total ...

Skip subpage navigation
Refine your search
Last Updated: June 06, 2024
Follow us on Instagram Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Facebook Follow us on X Follow us on YouTube Sign up on GovDelivery